Synthetic Benchmarks

The Pentium J2900 was just 12% faster than the Celeron J1900 in Cinebench eleven.5's multi-thread examination, while the single thread performance remained much the aforementioned.

When information technology comes to 3D benchmarks, the Pentium J2900 delivers very express operation due to its integrated Intel HD Graphics. The Pentium J2900 was just 6% faster than the Celeron J1900 while being 34% slower than the Athlon 5350.

The Pentium J2900 doesn't fare whatsoever better in the former 3Dmark06 benchmark, delivering a score of merely 2472pts -- iii% faster than the Celeron J1900 and 32% slower than the Athlon 5350.

The Pentium J2900 was just 1% faster than the Athlon 5350 in PCMark 7'southward system benchmark and half dozen% faster than the Celeron J1900.

The PCMark 8 domicile test saw the Pentium J2900 produce a score of 1447pts, making it 6% faster than the Celeron J1900 but fifty% slower than the Athlon 5350. Proceed in heed GPU performance is also existence tested here.

The Pentium J2900 scored 1360pts in the creative suite, or iv% faster than the Celeron J1900.

The Pentium J2900 delivered nigh the same performance equally the Celeron J1900 in the work suite as it was just 2% faster. Compared to the Athlon 5350, the J2900 was 40% slower.

The Pentium J2900 performs reasonably well when measuring functioning with role applications, though information technology was slightly slower than the Celeron J1900. That shouldn't actually be possible but subsequently three runs this was the average score. Nevertheless, with less than 50pts separating the two, that is well within the PCMark viii error of margin. Mayhap of greater importance, the J2900 was x% slower than the Athlon 5350.